Rosey on What the C Suite Needs to Know about recruiting in 2022

Rosey on What the C Suite Needs to Know about recruiting in 2022

 

Pivot to First explores topics and ideas with the goal of turning hiring into a competitive advantage. In this episode, Mike speaks with Rosey Nathan. In addition to being a podcaster extraordinaire based out of New Zealand, she is a Recruitment Partner with Customise Talent Group. You can also find her work as Career & Whole Human Mentor for Rosey on Recruitment and Career. She also has a varied background in Sales, Management, and recruiting in SaaS, FinTech, and other industries.

In this edition we explore:

  • What makes a happy workforce and what benefits does it bring to a company.
  • Explaining Employee Engagement in 3 words.
  • The recruiting hurdles employers are facing in the current market.
  • Some reasons why candidates’ counteroffers have increased up to 40%
  • How can candidates avoid pitfalls when looking for a new job.
  • Tips for happy recruiting in 2022
  • Fixing employers’ candidate flow problem via speed of engagement.
  • Rosey’s reading, movie, and TV recommendations.

Rosey Nathan on the web https://linktr.ee/roseyhercareer

The 5 Problems that Keep CEOs Up at Night

The 5 Problems that Keep CEOs Up at Night

Originally published by Industry Week 

 Ten years ago, we surveyed manufacturing CEOs to determine what kept them up at night. Coming on the heels of the Great Recession, concerns about another economic downturn were naturally top of mind. Worries about supply chain challenges—in the aftermath of the first significant global supply chain disruption and the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami of March 2011—were second. 

We informally surveyed CEOs again this October to gauge their current pain points. Following is a snapshot of top-ranked concerns facing U.S. manufacturing leaders toward the end of 2021.

  1. Talent recruitment and retention. No surprise here—unless you were expecting No. 1 to be supply chain disruptions. What was once a concern is now a crisis. Not only were there almost 900,000 job openings in manufacturing in the latest U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report, or about 9% of all private openings, but more than 300,000 manufacturing employees quit their jobs each month this summer. The Great Resignation is altering the global work landscape. On top of the struggle to attract younger workers—those with STEM skills and a general interest in mechanical and technical careers—manufacturers now have to deal with changing generational perceptions of work overall. Millennials and Gen Z are predicted to make up 30% of total employment by 2030.   

     

  2. Global supply chain disruptions. Hiccups in the production and distribution of materials, components and products have become the norm with the rise of global value chains. But today’s crisis, of course, is no hiccup: Jammed ports and supply bottlenecks have been the rule rather than the exception for a year. IHS Markit says that suppliers’ delivery times in the United States and the EU have hit record lengths due to surging demand. Consumer spending on durable goods is up more than 20% in the past year, and widespread supply constraints, including component and labor shortages, exacerbate the issue. In fact, shipping prices from China are up 400% since last year, and wait times for ocean freight up 45%. While some analysts believe that as COVID recedes, capacity constraints and labor shortages will also diminish, IHS Markit says the crunch could last for another 12 months—if not longer.
  3. Commodity and raw material prices. At the heart of much of today’s supply challenge is the shortage of commodities and raw materials, which have driven producer prices up dramatically. It’s hard for manufacturers to plan for growth in the face of unrelenting price spikes. The Federal Reserve’s Global Price Index for All Commodities stands at 167, the highest level in seven years. Moreover, Bloomberg’s index on raw-material spot prices is at a 10-year high. Oil prices are at their highest level since 2014, while according to the Fed, iron and steel prices are at their highest levels ever on the producer price index. Like so many other challenges, this one is not expected to resolve itself any time soon.
  4. Cyber threats. There is one dramatic difference between our CEO survey of 2011 and 2021: rapidly rising concern over cyber-attacks, especially regarding ransomware and malware, that can lead to equipment sabotage and system shutdowns. The Internet of Things has proven to be a dual-edged sword: Networking with the outside world means exposing yourself to the outside world. According to Statista Research and Analysis, there are 10 billion interconnected devices in the world today, which will climb to more than 25 billion by 2030. At least 4 billion are in use across all industries as well as government. This means unless manufacturers turn the clock back to 1990—restricting their employees’ access to email and cell phones and canceling plans to create smart factories and supply chains—their systems are at risk.
  5. General economic and global volatility. Economies across the globe are slowing considerably as the impact of the continuing pandemic (which wave is it now?) continues to plague businesses and consumers worldwide. On top of supply chain disruptions and labor shortages, there’s the specter of inflation. The federal government’s Consumer Price Index for All Urban consumers (CPI-U) is up 5.4% year over year, and according to the United Nations, global food prices are up 33% in the last 12 months. Adjusted for inflation and annualized, food prices around the world are at their highest level since 1960.

And yet … according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, after declining 5% in 2020, corporate profits were up 5% in the first quarter and more than 10% in the second quarter of 2021. Not too shabby considering the growing list of business concerns.   

Stephen Gold is president and CEO, Manufacturers Alliance

Webinar: Reactivating Passive Candidates

Webinar: Reactivating Passive Candidates

Overview

Many employers are experiencing a labor shortage. The previously inexhaustible pools of active candidates have been drying up. Now is the time for many of them to tap into their reserves to reactivate passive candidates.

Mike and Ric will talk about tapping into employers’ hidden market of previous applicants and reactivating passive candidates. Life happens and  the timing might not have been right when they first applied, but right now could be the right time! Refresh your talent pipeline and spark new interest in your previous applicants to fill your current openings.

Our Moderators

Mike Seidle is a serial entrepreneur and software developer with deep experience in HR Tech. Mike heads up product operations and product development for PivotCX. He brings over 30 years of experience in marketing, software development, product and user experience design, and a proven track record of leading technology-driven teams.

Ric Basso has over 30 years of professional sales management experience, 13 of which have been in the HR Tech space as one of the first 50 employees at Monster.com. As Vice President of Business Development, Ric is a passionate sales and partnerships leader with the personal mission of bringing people together to advance their lives.

 

How Cost Per Hire Is Killing Business – And It’s Not What You Think

How Cost Per Hire Is Killing Business – And It’s Not What You Think

Why is it that we obsess about metrics like cost per hire when the cost of not filling a job can literally kill an organization’s bottom line?


The Real Cost Per Hire

I was in a meeting with the CEO, CMO, Director of Recruiting, and key staffers at a Fortune 500 company. The discussion was on candidate flow and the difficulty they were having filling revenue-producing positions. As the company’s massive investment in equipment, bricks and mortar was lying idle, customers were passing them by.  

HR’s response to the talent shortage? They wouldn’t do anything to the recruiting strategy that would increase the company’s current $700 cost per hire by $50. 

Meanwhile, the CEO pointed out the cost of not filling a position, one position, was roughly $19,000 per month in lost revenue. When I heard there were about 1,000 open positions at the company, my jaw dropped.

HR was worried about saving $50 per hire while the opportunity cost per hire was $19,000 per month. The business was losing hundreds of millions in revenue because it wasn’t making hires.  But… HR was keeping that cost per hire number under $700.  So, save tens of dollars and not make millions.

Empty Seats Are Costing You

If your recruiting efforts aren’t keeping pace with your organization’s workforce needs, it may be time to gain a better understanding of what the cost of not making a hire really is. What is that empty seat costing you? What’s that empty mechanic bay costing you? That unfilled nursing slot? The missing restaurant manager? Or that empty hairstylist chair?

In conclusion, if you are in talent acquisition or HR, knowing the cost of not making a hire can make you a rock star to your CEO. When you consider the actual financial impact and lost opportunity, you may find a lot more budget and support for recruiting by framing the problem around the cost of not filling positions. The fact is, unfilled jobs are throttling the growth of most companies, and that’s probably the case at your company, too. 

CEOs and CFOs get it.

###

If you are tired of lost hiring opportunities, let’s connect. I’d like to understand the issues your company is facing and how PivotCX can help. Let’s talk about your recruiting.